Sources and verification
We prioritize original company announcements, official project documentation and on-record developer accounts. Sources are linked at the end of each reported article. We separate confirmed facts from our own analysis and do not treat a rumor or social post’s popularity as verification.
Dates and scope
Publication dates identify when our article appears. Announcement, effective and event dates are stated separately when relevant. Retrospectives are labeled. Source-based features do not imply that we conducted an interview, tested a product or independently obtained information.
People and credits
We name relevant contributors and their roles when supported by the source. We avoid attributing a team’s work to one person. Visuals carry credits; conceptual illustrations are labeled so they are not mistaken for gameplay screenshots or photographs.
AI assistance and responsibility
We may use AI tools for research support, drafting, editing and original illustrative graphics. AI output is not treated as a source. The publication is responsible for checking claims against cited material and for correcting mistakes.
Corrections
Report a possible error through our contact page with a source we can check. When a material factual error is corrected, we will add a dated note explaining the change. A new development is distinguished from a correction to the original coverage.
Advertising and commercial relationships
Sponsored articles and paid placements will be labeled. Affiliate links, if introduced, will be identified where they appear. A display advertisement is not an editorial recommendation. Google AdSense review is pending; display-ad serving has not been enabled in this version of the site.